-
Codifying Clan Engagement
12
May 28th, 2010UncategorizedWhile wars are not allowed to be waged through the vandalism of Clan wiki pages, I see no reason from forbidding discussion of such wars to occur on the wiki. Also I think there should be a code of conduct that each clan on the wiki should abide by. This code would include the proper procedures for initiating a war with another clan. The code would also differentiate between a ‘war’ and an ‘attack’, where the defending clan did not accept the war. Such attacks may even be regarded negatively by other clans.
Let me know your ideas for such a code, or let me know that you think this idea sucks. Either way I want to hear from you!
7 responses to “Codifying Clan Engagement” 
-
Can you explain more on the code..specifically. Then i will suggest… i really can’t understand it this time^^
Al Gilman Reply:
May 28th, 2010 at 5:23 pm@_DrakeGuard_, It would basically be a set of rules that clans on the wiki would be bound to abide by. These rules would cover topics such as interaction between clans.
-
_DrakeGuard_ [12] May 29th, 2010 at 01:44
Yeah i see that. A lot of clans are really doing wars especially Guardians of Doom. But there are no reason to forbid this clan wars, it makes one clan be more active^^. And its fun, i love role playing when it comes to clan wars.. But when it comes to clan page vandalism it gets to the point that the war isn’t a clan war cause it takes too personally. I think rules of clan interactions is not a bad idea. ^^
-
lizargeco [3] May 29th, 2010 at 04:25
Hey Al, long time no see! How’s it going?
Anyway, I see vandalism as wrong, as immoral, and above all, just annoying. It doesn’t make anyone look like the bigger man, and it reduces these interesting conflicts to nothing more than scuffling among children. It’s really sad.
Ironically, my clan’s been in the most wiki wars without actually being the ‘attacking’ clan. It’s always someone convincing someone else to declare war on us. As far as these attacks and wars go, I don’t really see a purpose to setting up rules, as an ‘attacking’ clan would bypass them anyway, seeing as they usually do.
There is one thing that would be helpful though… If the leaders of the opposing clans could meet before, during, and after the wars. It’s very difficult to dissuade someone when they respond a day or two later.
-
_DrakeGuard_ [12] May 29th, 2010 at 05:00
Well as a concerned wiki user, the rules suggested should not make a user banned in a senseless reason. Rules should be discussed. Like in a government process, before the rules are abide, they are approved by the executive then by the judiciary branch. I think the rules suggested must be posted in the wiki then voted by the users. They may also comment so we will hear the reactions about the rules being suggested for clan interactions^^
Al Gilman Reply:
May 31st, 2010 at 7:42 am@_DrakeGuard_, An opprotunity for discussion and critique of any proposed rules would be invaluable.
_DrakeGuard_ Reply:
May 31st, 2010 at 10:16 am@Al Gilman, i see why…it looks really invaluable…..codifying clans…pertains to codes…wait i’ll suggest a code…pls tell if the suggestion should like this….declaring a war must be coded like, ‘Attack’…then for the code of refuse, Surrender…for agreeing the war maybe, defend… this suggestion is just a try i’ll see to it if it’s right
Al Gilman Reply:
May 31st, 2010 at 5:13 pm@_DrakeGuard_, Codifying simply means to put into writing, there are not actual codes involved.
-
rebel287 [1] May 29th, 2010 at 11:17
I would be interested to see what your suggestions here are before supporting or opposing this really its hard to say. Clan war rules could be good but could turn out being ignored if too restrictive.
-
cedric [3] May 29th, 2010 at 13:14
you guy are so smart!
even i cant understand what you guys are saying. -
_DrakeGuard_ [12] May 30th, 2010 at 01:52
LOL^^
Well we are talking about if rules are agreeable by wiki users.
_DrakeGuard_ [12] May 28th, 2010 at 13:46